❕❕This carrd is still a work in progress as I continue to educate myself more adding more info or summarizing it as best as I can. This is basically just some rough draft (which is why it hasn’t been posted publicly just yet but it will be in the future) there may be misspells or incomplete info❕❕

Coexistinclus =🌈=
All possible good intentioned queer identities are valid and have been coexisting historically. Lgbt+ Identities are personal and self assigned. Some queer identities are categorized in some way, or have understable non-bigoted exclusions, (ulexens) and some redefine, nonconform, or further challenge binary ideas of queer identities (daylilians).
Why was this made? Why was is this very long/detailed?
I have ocd and dysphoria (very fun /sar) and I really wanted to differentiate my identity (being ulexen) from daylilians since I’m dysphoric of my identity being seen as part of that spectrum. I feel like making this helped elevated my dysphoria and I further educated myself more on Daylilians instead of remaining bitter and dysphoric of their existence like I was in the past, I have a better understanding now. Hopefully this carrd could also being peace and self validation to any other dysphoric Ulexens. I think the main reason for conflict in the queer community is > dysphoria < (regarding gender and/or attraction) because of those who project their identities and insecurities onto others. Queer Identities are self assigned though, your queer identity is yours in your own way, others identities are theirs in their own way. No one can dictate who you can and cant be. Even if you don’t get it they are still going to exist so it’s important to acknowledge their existence. It’s should just be seen as interesting how infinite and diverse queer identities can be. If it doesn’t harm you or anyone there’s literally nothing wrong with it. We’re all gonna coexist regardless, its better to be at peace with others.

** Note **
These weren’t made to separate the lgbt+ community nor does anyone have to use these labels if they don’t want to, this carrd in general simply made with the intention to educate how nuanced and personal queer identities can be.
Individuals that share the same label may not share the exact same experience with that identity, their individual experiences with that particular identity might share some similarities or they may be entirely different.
+FYI : both of these spectrums are inclusive of a-specs, neopronouns, xenogenders, pronoun nonconformity, nonbinary+ transmascs lesbians (not all transmascs are binary men), nonbinary+ transfem gays (not all transfems are binary women)

Ulexen * ∂ *
Common Identitfying Queer/LGBT+ : CIQ
When one's queer identity and the labels one uses is categorized in some way, it may have its limits or boundaries so that one can be affirmed or euphoric with themselves and others
— Mono : mono-Lesbians, mono-Gays, mono-Hets (transhets / nbyhets) [Including a-specs who are also mono] Ulexen mono-gays/straights are exclusively attracted to one gender (and possibly others genders similar to that one such as those under the nonbinary umbrella) their attraction OR interest is exclusive to their preferred gender, even if some may have attraction to other genders it’s irrelevant to their identity and they don’t identify as mspec at all.— Mspec : Bi, Pan, Omni, Ply, Hetero/Homoflexible and any other specific labels such as Sapphic and Achillean, those who combine these mspec terms (bi-homoflexible, pan-omni, bi-sapphic , omni-achillean), etc [Including a-specs who are also mspec] Ulexen Mspecs May only want to be seen as their respective mspec identity (they don’t identify as mono) or a combination of mspec orientations, regardless if they have preferences or not.— GNC and or Trans men/women who are and want to be seen as socially equal or similarly categorized with conforming cis men/women, despite their experiences, agab and/or presentation, or not wanting to note differences and just wanting be seen as socially equal to most binary men/women. Some may also be under the nonbinary umbrella : such as *some Demiboys/girls still wanting to be similarly categorized in some way with their binary counterparts.— And any others who do feel as though their identity in some way fits this spectrum

Dualilian
Being equally both, being fluid, or being in the grey area between the ulexen and daylilian spectrums in some way

(Left) Mostly Ulexen Flag * ∂\ // (Right) Mostly Daylilian Flag /※*Dialilian - being mostly daylilian than ulexenDulexen - being mostly ulexen than daylilian

Daylilian /※\
Contradicting OR Nonconformist Identifying Queer/LGBT+ : NCIQ, Non-CIQ
When ones queer experiences, identity, and or the labels one uses is seen as contradicting. It is done with intent of authenticity of themselves and their own life, and not to specific standards or expectations.
— Mspec-Mono: Mspec-Lesbians, Mspec-Gays , Mspec-straights : Bi-Lesbians, Bi-Gays, Pan-straight & many other possible combinations.
Reasons : having a strong preference, fluid attraction (Abrosexual), using the split attraction models, or just feeling a strong attachment to both experiences that they feel inseparable [Including a-specs who are also mspec-mono]
— Mono x Mono : Gaybians, Gayhet, Straightbians, etc other combinations : Commonly used by Nonbinary or Multi-gendered folks who feel their attraction very distinctive due their gender or experiences [also includes a-specs who identify with these terms aswell]** Usually under the nonbinary or multigender umbrella and/or not wanting to be categorized or compared similarly to cis folks of their gender and unlike ulexen trans/gnc folks **
— GNC Genderqueer Men, Trans Men who reclaim, feel attachment, comparable, capable of being, and or compatible with sapphics, and lesbians (some possibly feel compatible with straight men) /// GNC Genderqueer Women, Trans Women who reclaim, feel attachment, comparable, capable of being, and or compatible with (mlm) achilleans, and gay men. (some possibly feel compatible with straight women) [also inclusive of a-specs who identify this way]
— And any others who feel this spectrum is relatable in some way


Pro-mogai
Pro - all non harmful queer identities in general
This term is AGAINST : transmeds obviously because they are transphobic / radqueers because a lot of their identities are extremely harmful / radinclus originally didn’t really have bad intentions behind it but it’s a been very defamed by exclus and even the community itself, most likely cuz of radqueers also taking over that term/community.