❕❕This carrd is still a work in progress, this is basically just some rough draft of this idea (which is why it hasn’t been posted publicly just yet but it will be in the future) there may be misspells or incomplete info. There will be sources in the future❕❕

Coexistinclus =🌈=
All possible good intentioned queer identities are valid and have been coexisting. Queer identities are unique and personal. Some queer identities are categorized in some way, or have understable non-bigoted exclusions, (ulexens) and some redefine, nonconform, or challenge binary ideas of queer identity (daylilians).This term is entirely separate from “radinclus” being somewhat similar to critinclus. However both fail to acknowledge those who also have understandable boundaries/limits in their identities (especially if it’s due to exclusive attraction, gender dysphoria or both, boundaries like these on someones personal identity should be respected and not challenged or questioned as with anyone else’s identity). This term was made specifically to also highlight the importance of respecting each queer individuals identity being their own, understandable limits and exclusivity on some identities can coexist with those who contradict and redefine labels due to their own personal reasonings. No one should define others identities that aren’t their own. No one likes their identity being questioned or invalidated. Identities are personal you can’t make anyone conform or nonconform to certain ideas if they do not want to it’s personal and up to the individual how they want to define themselves.

** Note **
These weren’t made to separate the lgbt+ community nor does anyone have to use these labels if they don’t want to, they were simply made with the intention to educate and spread awareness of of how nuanced and personal queer identities can be. Even if some individuals share the same label they may not share the exact same experience with that identity, their individual experiences with that particular identity might share some similarities or they may be entirely different.+FYI : both of these spectrums are inclusive of a-specs, neopronouns, xenogenders, pronoun nonconformity, nonbinary+ transmascs lesbians (not all transmascs are binary men), nonbinary+ transfem gays (not all transfems are binary women)

Ulexen * ∂ *
Common Identitfying Queer/LGBT+ : CIQ
When one's queer identity and the labels one uses is categorized in *some way, it may have its limits or boundaries so that one can be affirmed or euphoric with themselves and others++They wouldn’t willingly do anything that would involve them contradicting theirs or others queer Identity (orientation and/or gender identity). In order to remain euphoric with their identity and or to keep others euphoric in their own.— Mono : mono-Lesbians, mono-Gays, mono-Queerhets (transhets / nbyhets) [Including a-specs who are also mono] Ulexen mono-gays/straights are exclusively attracted to one gender (sometimes with exceptions of those under the nonbinary umbrella specifically) their attraction OR interest is exclusive to their preferred gender, they aren’t mspec at all— Mspec : Bi, Pan, Omni, Ply, Hetero/Homoflexible and any other specific labels such as Sapphic and Achillean, those who combine these mspec terms (bi-homoflexible, pan-omni, bi-sapphic , omni-achillean), etc [Including a-specs who are also mspec] Ulexen Mspecs identify exclusively as mspec (NOT mono gay/lesbian/straight) they are just their respective mspec identity or a combination of mspec orientations, regardless if they have preferences or not.— GNC and or Trans men/women who are and want to be seen as socially equal or similarly categorized with conforming cis men/women, despite their experiences, agab and/or presentation, or not wanting to note differences and just wanting be seen as socially equal to most binary men/women. Some may also be under the nonbinary umbrella : such as *some Demiboys/girls still wanting to be similarly categorized in some way with their binary counterparts.— And any others who do feel as though their identity in some way fits this spectrum

Daylilian /※\
Contradicting OR Nonconformist Identifying Queer/LGBT+ : NCIQ, Non-CIQ
When ones queer experiences, identity, and or the labels one uses is non-conformingly contradicting from the usual categorized established beliefs. It is done with intent of authenticity of themselves and their own life, and not to specific standards or expectations.— Mspec-Mono: Mspec-Lesbians, Mspec-Gays , Mspec-straights : Bi-Lesbians, l Bi-Gays, Pan-straight & many other possible combinations : usually due to having a strong preference, using the split attraction models, or just feeling a strong attachment to both experiences that they feel inseparable [Including a-specs who are also mspec-mono] Mspec-monos gay/straights are mono AND mspec, they are connected to two or more usually separate experiences, combining and identifying with the identities for their own unique or nuanced reasonings.— Mono x Mono : Gaybians, Gayhet, Straightbians, etc other combinations : Commonly used by Nonbinary or Multi-genders who feel their attraction very distinctive due their gender or experiences [also includes a-specs who identify with these terms aswell]** Usually but not always under the nonbinary or multigender umbrella and not wanting to be categorized or compared similarly to cis folks of their gender and unlike ulexen trans or gnc people **
— GNC Genderqueer Men, ftm Trans Men who reclaim, feel attachment, comparable, capable of being, and or compatible with sapphics, and lesbians (some possibly feel compatible with straight men) /// GNC Genderqueer Women, mtf Trans women who reclaim, feel attachment, comparable, capable of being, and or compatible with (mlm) achilleans, and gay men. (some possibly feel compatible with straight women) [also inclusive of a-specs who identify this way]— And any others who feel this spectrum is relatable in some way, their personal identity is beyond typical categories, outside of conformity in general, OR they do conform but in their own specific wayOther Specific daylilian labels :
Dialilians - someones who gender identity falls under the daylilian category but who’s orientation is exclusively mono
- ex : a genderqueer woman, mtf trans woman who is strictly exclusively a mono gay, gayhet, or gaybian
- ex : a genderqueer man, or ftm trans man who is strictly exclusively a mono lesbian, straightbian, or gaybian
Dulexen- Someone who orientation is from the daylilian category but who’s gender is from ulexen category
- ex : a binary gnc man (ulexen) and is polysexual/gay (daylilian)
- ex : a binary trans woman (ulexen) and is a bi-lesbian (daylilian)
Dualilian- Being open to being, being both, or being fluid between ulexen/daylilian spectrums in some way.

❎ This term is AGAINST : transmeds obviously because they are transphobic / radqueers because a lot of their identities are extremely harmful / radinclus while good intentioned the idea fails to mention understandable boundaries in certain individuals identities aswell and is only aiming to be inclusive of ALL and pushing the limits while not being aware about others dysphoria and misinformation it can cause due to not specifying differences and how uniquely personal queer identities are experienced. (Which is and has been seen as transphobic / homophobic / mspec-phobic due to not also mentioning those with boundaries to their identities also) Not everyone is going to have this shared experience on wanting to be nonconformingly contradicting or wanting to redefine labels they use, while that’s a valid queer experience for some, just as label policing is harmful, it shouldn’t be pressured onto others (even if good intentioned it can still possibly cause dysphoria or conflict), some do or want to conform or fit in certian categories or binary ideas of labels in some way for personal affirmative and euphoric reasons it should be understandable. Established common beliefs on certain identities aren’t just going to go away. No one likes having their identity being questioned or invalidated in anyway, to each their own on how they choose to individually label themselves or categorize themselves as / +Any other queer label exclusionist ❎